Henri Korn*, Philippe Faure
The
search for chaotic patterns has occupied numerous investigators in
neuroscience, as in many other fields of science. Their results and main
conclusions are reviewed in the light of the most recent criteria that need to
be satisfied since the first descriptions of the surrogate strategy. The methods
used in each of these studies have almost invariably combined the analysis of
experimental data with simulations using formal models, often based on modified
Huxley and Hodgkin equations and/or of the Hindmarsh and Rose models of
bursting neurons. Due to technical limitations, the results of these
simulations have prevailed over experimental ones in studies on the nonlinear
properties of large cortical networks and higher brain functions. Yet, and
although a convincing proof of chaos (as defined mathematically) has only been
obtained at the level of axons, of single and coupled cells, convergent results
can be interpreted as compatible with the notion that signals in the brain are
distributed according to chaotic patterns at all levels of its various forms of
hierarchy.
This
chronological account of the main landmarks of nonlinear neurosciences follows
an earlier publication [Faure, Korn, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. III 324
(2001) 773–793] that was focused on the basic concepts of nonlinear dynamics
and methods of investigations which allow chaotic processes to be distinguished
from stochastic ones and on the rationale for envisioning their control using
external perturbations. Here we present the data and main arguments that
support the existence of chaos at all levels from the simplest to the most
complex forms of organization of the nervous system.
We first
provide a short mathematical description of the models of excitable cells and
of the different modes of firing of bursting neurons (Section 1). The
deterministic behavior reported in giant axons (principally squid), in
pacemaker cells, in isolated or in paired neurons of Invertebrates acting as
coupled oscillators is then described (Section 2). We also consider chaotic
processes exhibited by coupled Vertebrate neurons and of several components of
Central Pattern Generators (Section 3). It is then shown that as indicated by
studies of synaptic noise, deterministic patterns of firing in presynaptic
interneurons are reliably transmitted, to their postsynaptic targets, via
probabilistic synapses (Section 4).
This
raises the more general issue of chaos as a possible neuronal code and of the
emerging concept of stochastic resonance Considerations on cortical dynamics
and of EEGs are divided in two parts. The first concerns the early attempts by
several pioneer authors to demonstrate chaos in experimental material such as
the olfactory system or in human recordings during various forms of epilepsies,
and the belief in ‘dynamical diseases’ (Section 5). The second part explores
the more recent period during which surrogate-testing, definition of unstable
periodic orbits and period-doubling bifurcations have been used to establish
more firmly the nonlinear features of retinal and cortical activities and to
define predictors of epileptic seizures (Section 6).
Finally
studies of multidimensional systems have founded radical hypothesis on the role
of neuronal attractors in information processing, perception and memory and two
elaborate models of the internal states of the brain (i.e. ‘winnerless
competition’ and ‘chaotic itinerancy’). Their modifications during cognitive
functions are given special attention due to their functional and adaptive
capabilities (Section 7) and despite the difficulties that still exist in the
practical use of topological profiles in a state space to identify the physical
underlying correlates. The reality of ‘neurochaos’ and its relations with
information theory are discussed in the conclusion (Section 8) where are also
emphasized the similarities between the theory of chaos and that of dynamical
systems. Both theories strongly challenge computationalism and suggest that new
models are needed to describe how the external world is represented in the
brain. To cite this article: H. Korn, P. Faure, C. R. Biologies 326
(2003).
2003 Académie des sciences.
Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords: neuronal dynamics;
neurochaos; networks; chaotic itinerancy; winnerless competition;
representation; neuronal code

0 comments:
Post a Comment